FIRST EXAMPLE: misgiving ATTACKS
I agree to have motion picture oversight cameras in public places, because they will help in preventing, detecting and analyzing several(a) untoward incidents like terror attacks. In the year 2008, Indias fiscal capital Mumbai was attacked by Terrorist. The main suspect, Ajmal Kasab, was identified by footage record in a CCTV camera. By this we can understand that having surveillance cameras in public places is vital for safety. In public gatherings, video cameras help in monitoring crowds and identifying problems. It also creates sense of security measure for the public because of constant vigilance provided by the police. If an neighborhood is go around to the public, you expect that people will be able to view you, and you have nothing to worry about if youre not committing a crime. The only public places that should not have cameras would be bathrooms or dressing rooms because people expect privacy in those areas.
SECOND EXAMPLE: BURGLARY
Police believe they have puzzle out at least 20 burglary cases in the affluent Bangsar and Travers area with the arrest of a man here. Brickfields police chief garter Commissi wizardr of Police Wan Abdul Bari Wan Abdul Khalid said the 21-year-old suspect was detained on Dec 2 at a petrol locate in Taman Seri Sentosa. He led police to his home in Pangsapuri KTMB in Bangsar, where they found 99 stolen items, including a Perodua Myvi and computers, keys, hand phones, photograph albums and wedding gowns.
THIRD EXAMPLE: KIDNAPPING
Kidnapping has become one of the top moneymakers for organized crime in the region. Mexico, Colombia, Venezuela, Brazil, Haiti, and Ecuador are all part of the top ten worst kidnapping countries in the world. El...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .
No comments:
Post a Comment