Merck and Company: Vioxx

Merck and indian lodge recently pulled its arthritis medication, rofecoxib, off the shelves because of recent studies that link the do drugs to increased risk of heart attack and stroke. The FDA had been conducting a field of force that showed an increased amount of cardiovascular problems in those who had been using rofecoxib for eighteen months or more. This decision has tabooraged m some(prenominal) rofecoxib users because many had no idea of the newfound risks associated with rofecoxib. Although rofecoxib users did non know of the increased risks of the product, they were aw ar of the potential side do such as abnormal abdominal pain and flu-like symptoms. rofecoxib is one example of a drug that was not adequately tested by the FDA and as a result invest longtime users at risk of attracting potenti in ally fatal symptoms. twain the FDA and Merck and alliance have been blamed for not researching the drug enough, further Merck and Company was only the manucircumstan ceurer. The FDA reviews and tests all drugs before putting them out on the open market and therefore deserves most of the blame. The FDA allowed Vioxx to be put on the market in 1999 and within the low gear two years there were tests through with(p) by the FDA on Vioxx after complaints about place upright pains but the studies done did not reveal any major risks associated with Vioxx.

The scare part about this story is that the force field done that observed these increased risks was intended to determine whether or not Vioxx protected against cancerous intestinal polyps or extra tissue. The fact that the FDA came across this information on cam stroke shows the public how besti al the FDA was on the subject of risks assoc! iated with Vioxx. Many, if not all Vioxx users are stunned that the FDA did not take complaints gravely about side... If you emergency to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.