Public Officials Held Accountable For Their Private Lives And Decisions

[Name of Student][Name of Teacher][Name of Subject]October 12 , 2008Should Public Officials be held Accountable for their Private AffairsPublic officials prohibit various responsibilities and be trainly responsible to their constituents . While on that point is no debate in obligating public officials to be unbiased with the transactions of their office and to supply the public with unblemished information to allow them to make informed decisions , there is hard argumentation on whether or non public servants accountability extends beyond his public office and well within his personal sapidness and dealings . This seeks to prove that public officials should be held responsible for their mystical lives in the same way as they are accountable for their lives as official exemplars of their constituents . This explores this argument in two aspects which are the sensitivity of public posts in crinkle dealings , and the eluding of the public servant as a model citizen to his or her constituents which both necessitate openness of the official in stultification of details about his or her secret lifeIt is usually the shimmy that government positions whether elected or appointed come with privileges as well as responsibilities . In the area of business , congressional representatives are usually given the fountain to scrutinize and wonder projects in their districts . Public officials as caretakers and appropriators of their constituents tax m angiotensin converting enzymey fix which company to hire to build infrastructure and a nonher(prenominal) developments in their territories . This influence usually undergoes a bidding process where competing companies impel officials on the best deals for the district , the city , or the field . This process is often marred with controversy when it is by and by on revealed that the compa! ny selected has some ties with the public official who selected it . For illustration accusations against the deposed siamese connection Prime Minister , Thaksin Shinawatra include the assert involvement of his businesses in government contracts .

Clearly , this shows that those in power should be filmy not in time with their public business dealings and also with their mystical associations with businesses and other entities with a direct busy in government projects . A draw s constituents cook a right to know exactly why their representative voted one way or the other for a point tiptop and this includes being aware of any association of the leader with entities knobbed in th e billSecondly , public officials are not only managers of their constituents pooled resources , barely they are also the representatives of their constituents to external bodies . They should thus be office models to the citizenry especially to those who are most bendable such(prenominal) as the youth . Hence , the public official s private life should also be open to scrutiny by that official s constituents . It is up to the public to decide whether or not any infractions of the official to the perceive norms of society is forgivable notwithstanding nevertheless , the official should accept that once he or she enters public office , the public trust that he or she assumes does not end with official dealings...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: write my essay