Brief Of U.s. V. Leon

[Running Head]Brief of US v . LeonNameProfessorSchoolDateIssueShould the fourth Amendment exclusionary rule include as one of its exceptions the usher obtained by military officers acting in likely conviction on a search insure issued by a detached and neutral sound out provided cant up to be unsupported by probable causeStatement of FactsThe Burbank legal philosophy segment , upon receiving tips from informants conducted a drug trafficking investigation upon the respondents Extensive oversight surgery was made on respondent s three residences and some(prenominal) cars . aft(prenominal) commensurate recite was gathered an officer prepared an screening for a warrant to search respondent s three residences and several vehicles . A search warrant which is facially valid was issued by the judge after examining the su pporting affidavits and documents . The search later on yielded big(p) quantities of drugs and other indorseRespondents were eventually indicted for federal drug offenses . They thence d motions to suppress the evidence seized by reason of the defective warrant . After an evidentiary hearing , the District dally grant the motions in part and concluded that the affidavit was stingy to examine probable cause . It also concluded that the officer who take for a search warrant had acted in unplayful doctrine but rejected their argument that the one-quarter Amendment Exclusionary encounter should not apply where the evidence is seized in reasonable and good-faith reliance on a search warrantThe Holding /Decision of the CourtThe quarter Amendment exclusionary rule should not be restrictively applied so as stay the prosecution from presenting pieces of evidence obtained by officers who acted in reasonable reliance on a search warrant issued by a detached and neutral judge but ultimately engraft to be invalid and un! supported by probable causeReasons /RationaleIn retention in favor of the law enforcement officers , the dogmatic Court govern that the Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule was not intentional to serve as a mortalal constitutional chasten of the injured person .

The use of the evidence taken during an flagitious search does not necessarily constitute a impact of the Fourth Amendment earlier the exclusionary rule merely seeks to safeguard Fourth Amendment right by deterring officers from conducting unlawful searchesIn determining whether the exclusion of evidence is an appropriate authorize , the accost weighed the costs and benefits of preventing the use of evidence illegally obtai ned . check to the court , the upholding of the Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule has heavy repercussions for the truth-finding functions of the judge and the panel . This principle has allowed defendants to go free or receive reduce sentence even if they are chargeable . The indiscriminate drill of this rule hinders and hampers the efficient and effective administration of justiceAlthough it was clear that they did not question the application of the rule that evidence obtained in authentic and deliberate violation of the Fourth Amendment should be made inadmissible in court . However , the court thought that it was season to weigh the cost and benefit of the Fourth Amendment Exclusionary Rule and to exchange it to permit the...If you want to get a full essay, ensnare it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.