Objectifying the Doll in a House of Men

For thousands of years, fowls have been a toy caprioleed with pocket-size girls for their amusement. It is evoke, then, that within the past a few(prenominal) centuries men have begun to ring women their dolls. Is this merely an innocent embrace name, or does it represent the political orientation that men hold regarding women, dismissing them as mere toys for their amusement? In A Dolls House, Henrik Ibsen uses symbolism to establish the agreeable underlying theme as the oppression and objectification of women in the 1800s. \nThe de residenceation A Dolls House is the first sign of thematic significance employ in the play. Nora mentions dolls houses a few quantify early in the play such as when she buys toy dolls for her daughter and mentions that the fact they were chintzy did not matter since they would or so kindredly break soon. This is an interesting parallel as it suggests that Nora is facelift her daughter to experience a future life interchangeable to her o wn, and foreshadows Nora leaving her preserve and family at the end of the play. When Nora refers to her children, she calls them her little dollies. However, the doll metaphor is not completely clear until the end of the play. Nora argues to Torvald that both(prenominal) he and her father tough her like a doll, and uses this as one of the reasons as to why she has become dissatisfied and profligate with their marriage. \nAt the beginning of the play, Nora and her husband Torvald have a handling about Noras using up habits. Torvald begins using nicknames for Nora such as my little squirrel and my little feature. The pet names for her much begin with little, which belittles Nora and emphasizes her treatment like a child who isnt taken seriously and not considered an equal. Torvald maintains complete control all over Nora and uses her dependence on him to his advantage. He focuses on money and bourgeois aspects rather than people, to the point that his grit of masculinity h as a have correlation with his fi...